
Photo © BigStockPhoto/Pavel Losevsky
Bring acoustic considerations in early
Acoustical engineers sometimes find themselves called into a project late in the design phase, perhaps asked to review and sign off on plans after the detail work has been done. In such cases, they may discover issues such as a racquetball court or weight room designed without adequate measures to protect the adjacent units from vibration and noise. At this point, reworking the plans to deal with the issues, or design of sound isolation measures may be onerous indeed.
Acoustical engineers provide their best value when brought into the design process early, well before detailed work is done. They can point out issues that may require costly design solutions down the road, which can often be eliminated through careful space planning. The result can be a low-cost change made to the plans to help the building meet acoustic requirements. The engineers can also point out potential trouble spots such as inadequate space between walls that may allow certain noises to be transmitted from one unit to another.
Revisions made in the early design phases can eliminate the need for more costly changes later or even more expensive alterations to completed construction, including post-sale retrofits.
How design and materials affect acoustics
It may be impossible for builders to stay current on all the factors affecting a project’s performance—they must be able to depend on specialized professionals such as acoustical engineers for advice. However, they should also be educated about some of the more common factors influencing acoustics.
These factors might include simple steps such as using caulking to seal the gap that often occurs where a wall’s gypsum wallboard meets the floor. These gaps can allow sound to leak from one unit to another. Or, it could be installing electrical outlets opposite each other creates a pathway for sound to travel easily between units.
Another factor might be the correct installation of noise control materials. For example, a design might specify resilient channels to decouple walls from supporting studs for increased sound-isolation performance. However, this author’s experience shows work crews will sometimes put their drywall screws in too far, directly connecting the drywall to the stud. The result serves as a conductor for noise between units.

Photo © BigStockPhoto/Endomotion
As another example, sometimes deficient walls are discovered where the builder simply forgot or neglected to put insulation in the wall cavity. These examples demonstrate crews must be reminded of the importance of proper installation techniques, as these types of mistakes easily result in decreased sound isolation performance, failed field tests, or, in the worst cases, annoyed residents.
Check to see reality matches the plans
Just as project owners keep watch over the construction process to ensure the trades and subs are following the plans and carrying out good practices, they need to be certain noise-management issues are met. As part of the Tarion field review process, acoustical engineers are required to make random inspections of the work in process, carrying out tests of completed sections of the work.
Beyond this, project owners need to keep themselves informed about acoustic issues in their buildings so they too can ensure there are no short-cuts being taken that will impair acoustic performance.
Acoustical engineers can provide good advice during the construction phase. This could be particularly useful if builders find the construction cannot proceed according to plan; for example, it may turn out there is no room to install recommended noise controls. The acoustical engineer could then make recommendations on alternative solutions that will fill and still provide the required degree of acoustical performance. For example, it may be possible to use a shorter silencer in combination with lined ductwork if the required silencer will not fit in the mechanical room.
The science of acoustics as applied to construction is constantly changing, in part because new construction materials are always being introduced, and these may have acoustic implications. Some proprietary formulations of wallboard can deliver better sound isolation performance due to increased mass and damping than traditional products. However, many condominium developers can seek out lower-cost ways to achieve similar results. For instance, it is possible to increase wall mass by doubling up drywall layers. Additional sound-damping can be added by specifying relatively inexpensive visco-elastic glues.
The National Research Council Institute for Research in Construction (NRC-IRC) tests construction materials and methods, and publicizes its findings in its Construction Technology Updates (CTUs). (The CTUs are available online at www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/eng/ibp/irc/ctus/ctus-index.html). From CTU 1 that discussed “Control of Sound Transmission through Gypsum Board Walls” in 1997, to CTU 27 on the “Effect of Electrical Outlet Boxes on Sound Isolation of Gypsum Board Walls” in 1999, to the more recent CTU 66 on the effect of flanking transmission in “Airborne Sound Insulation in Multi-family Buildings” in 2008, the NRC resources have a history of providing concise summaries of valuable research that acoustical consultants all over the world review and that every builder needs to know.
Conclusion
For all condominium developers, building a trusting relationship with a professional firm that offers qualified acoustic and vibration services is the first step to meet with the new requirements of Tarion Bulletin 19R. Having an acoustical engineer involved with the condominium design can result in a smoother-running project, lower costs, and more satisfied owners. The key is to get an acoustical engineer involved in the project as early as possible.
Ryan Bessey, P.Eng., is an acoustical, noise, and vibration engineer with Golder Associates Ltd., based in the company’s Toronto office. He has 10 years of experience helping builders manage acoustic issues. Bessey can be reached via e-mail at ryan_bessey@golder.com.
One thing that the article fails to mention is IIC sound attenuation in floor /ceiling assemblies. The Canadian Code has requirements for STC noise performance, but none for IIC. Because of this, Toronto, Vancouver and other major metropolitan markets in Canada are the “wild west” when it comes to the marketing of bogus IIC noise reduction solutions. The lack of a clear building code mandate has created a situation where the STRATA’s and Developers only want to see a big IIC number on a data sheet, without a clear understanding of what those numbers mean, and in many cases that the number on the data sheet can never be replicated in the built environment of the real world of multi-family construction. In many cities in the Canadian market, if there the data sheet does not show numbers in the 70’s for STC and IIC, a product or system is not marketable. In reality, with common multi-family construction details (152mm slab with no ceiling assembly) values higher than the low to mid 50’s are not achievable with hard surface flooring materials.
Is there the same testing for single dwelling homes