Distinctive Sears building denied heritage designation

Kitchener (Ont.) city council voted seven-three against protecting the distinctive concrete façade of a former Sears building with a heritage designation. Photo courtesy Waterloo Region Record, via Facebook
The Kitchener (Ont.) city council voted against protecting the concrete façade of a former Sears building with a heritage designation.
Photo courtesy Waterloo Region Record, via Facebook

Earlier this month, the Kitchener, Ont., city council voted seven-three against protecting the distinctive concrete façade of a former Sears building with a heritage designation. The 53-year-old building was built in the Kennedy-era international style.

The Kitchener’s heritage committee had earlier called for the building to be protected with a heritage designation. Designation would prevent alterations to the building’s heritage elements and demolition without council approval.

The former Sears building, with its distinctive ribbed, precast concrete, was built in 1965 as an anchor store for the Fairview Park Mall. Building owner Cadillac Fairview wants to demolish the façade and part of the building in a major redevelopment of the mall. Finley McEwen, Cadillac Fairview’s senior vice-president of development, urged the council to not designate the building.

The heritage designation “would essentially render the property undevelopable,” McEwen told the Waterloo Region Record. “It would essentially tie our hand and prevent a one-in-50-year redevelopment opportunity from progressing.”

He said the current building has a number of problems such as the lack of windows that makes it an undesirable office space. The precast concrete does not insulate well, and the caulking contains toxins, he said. “The Sears building is not functional in its current form. It has not stood the test of time,” added McEwen.

Leave a Comment

  1. what a shame – it’s a beautiful building and has to be saved. I find it hard to believe that developers will consider renovating this. Disappointed a company as well considered as Cadillac Fairview, would demolish this. shame.

  2. Yes, it’s sad. Surely other architectural enhancements could have worked to improve lighting & so on. Destroying the building is just showing Cadillac’s greed imho.

Leave a Comment

Comments

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *